The Story of Self-Interstitials in Silicon

After electron tubes went out of style around 1970, the word "electronics" became more or less synonymous with "silicon devices". Silicon devices like microprocessors, memories, solar cells, or power handling devices like thyristors, are made by diffusing certain substitutional impurity atoms into precisely determined regions of a silicon crystal. Silicon technology and thus "electronics" is based on diffusion, and diffusion of atoms in crystals, as the reigning dogma stated, needed vacancies.
In the beginning of silicon technology nobody had a problem with that because nobody expected any problems. Why shouldn't things in silicon not be like in all other simple cubic crystals, where atoms were certain to diffuse via vacancies?
However, before one can start to make a silicon device by diffusing impurity atoms like phosphorous, (P), arsenic (As) or boron (B) into the silicon, one needs to make a silicon crystal first. Not just any silicon crystal but a rather large and rather perfect single crystal, absolutely free of dislocations and, as far as possible, of precipitates or other small clusters of something.
Fortunately, making rather perfect crystals is possible with silicon. Actually, it is only possible with silicon (and to a lesser extent with germanium (Ge)). Rather large dislocation-free single crystals of silicon can be "pulled from the melt", using all kinds of ingenious tricks, and these crystals produced a completely new situation concerning vacancies in equilibrium. As in all materials, vacancies must be present in the equilibrium concentration right after solidification. As the freshly solidified material cools down, the equilibrium concentration of vacancies decreases exponentially, and the vacancies no longer needed must "disappear". This is true for all crystals. Getting rid of surplus vacancies is no big problem in almost all crystals since the vacancies only need to move to the nearest dislocation, grain boundary, or whatever "large" defect is nearby, where it can get absorbed and thus effectively withdrawn form the free vacancy population.
The exception are the perfect silicon crystals that do not contain large defects that could absorb surplus vacancies. So with the advent of big perfect silicon crystals, a new question came up: How can the silicon crystal get rid of its surplus vacancies while it cools down?
Good question - but still no problem. The surplus vacancies simply would cluster and form larger aggregates. Either three-dimensional voids or, if they form a platelet, little dislocation loops with stacking faults inside as shown here. That kind of stuff had been seen in other cubic crystals and there was still no need to worry.
So when silicon crystal growers did indeed find some small defects in their crystals, made visible by some tricky etching procedure, nobody worried much. Here are some pictures of what I'm talking about:
Point defect clusters in silicon
Swirl defects in silicon made visible by defect etching
The picture on the left shows a cross-section of a 5 cm crystal. The picture on the right shows a closer (optical microscopy) view of the pattern; the "dots" in the inset are about 1 µm in size.
On the left hand side a complete defect-etched wafer is shown (with only about 5 cm diameter in these early silicon times); on the left we give one of those "spiral arms" a closer look. Essentially there are a lot of tiny (around 1 µm) features on the surface, that resulted from etching-out some defect that was supposedly some vacancy cluster.
The fact that all these defects were arranged in a kind of spiral pattern didn't worry anybody; this could be understood in principle by looking at the nucleation of these defects in conjunction with the special crystal growth conditions. The spiral pattern thus only inspired the name "swirl defects" for this special kind of "vacancy clusters".
All that was needed (for perfectionists) was to look at some of those defects in an electron microscope, just to make sure that they were indeed the vacancy clusters that we all knew they must be. Unfortunately, the density of those things was far too small for a random search. You were not likely to find one of those guys in a random specimen taken from the silicon crystal, since the volume one can investigate in an electron microscope is so small. It's like searching for a lost contact lens in a base ball field by looking with magnifying glasses at one square foot a day. You are not going to find it very quickly.
Of course, after defect etching you knew where you should have looked - but now the defect was gone.
Well, some guys at Siemens around Dr. Bernd O. Kolbesen , my good friend ever since, succeeded in preparing some specimen where one could find those defects in an electron microscope (albeit not without a lot of work and frustration) 1). For those samples one needed a special high-voltage electron microscope, of which there were only two in all of Europe - and I was the guy who had access to one of those monsters in 1974. We got together, did the work, and found that swirl defects looked like this:
Swirl defects in Si
Schematic lattice drawing of a dislocaiton 
loop with a stacking faullt.
Observed swirl defects and a schematic lattice model of a
vacancy type dislocation loop with a stacking fault.
That was still fine - what we have are dislocation loops around some stacking fault (upper row) and loops without stacking faults (lower row). They were a bit on the big side, but so what. The fact that some loops had no stacking fault was also easily understood within conventional dislocation theory, and there was still nothing to worry about.
What one needs to know now is that in principle, interstitial atoms could do pretty much the same thing as vacancies. They could cluster in a plane producing a dislocation loop with a stacking fault. A schematic drawing corresponding to the one above but showing interstitial-type clustering is shown in this link. If imaged under usual conditions, these interstitial type dislocation loops would look pretty much like the ones shown above.
The pictures above thus only show that there are the expected kinds of dislocation loops, but not if they are of the vacancy type or interstitial type.
Fortunately, there is a way of telling. It involves a bit of tricky electron microscopy (rather error prone), and after we improved the way to do this2), we analyzed a number of those loops and found to the utter amazement of all involved:

Swirl defects are
interstitial type dislocation loops!

Surprise! It sure looked as if self-interstitial are the dominating point defects in silicon, and not vacancies, as automatically assumed (for good reasons, to be sure!) by all and sundry - except for my Boss: Prof. Alfred Seeger. Together with a guy named Chik he had analyzed diffusion data and postulated that in silicon the self-interstitial would be involved in a major way in the diffusion of atoms.
In the small world of silicon material scientists this was a rather momentous discovery, in particular because it gave substance to Seeger's claim that diffusion in silicon would proceed via some mechanism mediated by self-interstitials and not vacancies.
Momentous discoveries like this always receive the same treatment from one's peers: the whole thing is doubted and ridiculed. Just look at the Nobel-prize winning discovery of quasicrystals for another example. However, since others eventually corroborated our findings, self-interstitials became eventually accepted as major point defects in silicon. It only was forgotten to give us the Nobel prize, unfortunately.
Where do we stand today? Well - the final word is not yet in. There is no doubt anymore that both vacancies and self interstitials occur in silicon with relevant concentrations, and that diffusion does involve self-interstitials at least in some cases. However, things turned out to be far more complicated than "naively" expected in an "only vacancies" or "only self-interstitials" kind of picture, and we still do not have good basic data like the formation and migration energies for vacancies and interstitials in silicon.
The problem is that it is exceedingly difficult to measure experimentally exactly what is going on. The classical methods for looking at point defects directly completely fail in the case of silicon, and the more indirect methods are mostly ambiguous.
Like with electron microscope pictures of dislocation loops, measurable things in diffusion often look pretty much the same for both possible mechanism: diffusion via vacancies or via interstitials.
To be sure, various high-powered groups of scientists have suggested definite numbers and mechanisms but the final word has not yet been spoken. It will not take much longer, however, because in the not too distant future we will simply be able to calculate all that stuff. Ironically, this will be possible since silicon chip complexity and therefore computing power keeps growing despite the fact that we do not fully understand what we are doing when we make chips by employing diffusion of atoms in silicon.

1) FÖLL, H., KOLBESEN, B.O.: "Formation and nature of swirl defects in silicon". Appl. Physics 8 (1975) p. 319
1) FÖLL, H., WILKENS, M.: "A simple method for the analysis of dislocation loops". Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 31 (1975) p. 519

© H. Föll

With frame With frame as PDF

go to Diffusion in Iron

go to Defect Etching in Silicon

go to 5.2.1 The Gang of Four

go to Nucleation Science

go to Diffusion in Iron

go to Segregation at Room Temperature

go to Dislocation Science

go to Experimental Techniques for Measuring Diffusion Parameters

go to Transmission Electron Microscopes

go to Segregation in Silicon

go to Producing "Nirvana" Silicon or Nearly Perfect Silicon Single Crystals

go to Single Crystal Silicon

go to Quasi Crystals

go to Atomic Mechanisms of Diffusion

go to Making Vacancies

go to 5.3.4 Bulky Things

go to Precipitation and Structures

go to Dislocation Science - 2. The Reality

go to Semiconductor Technology

© H. Föll (Iron, Steel and Swords script)