 |
The free electron gas model works with a
constant potential. This is, of course,
a doubtful approximation; essentially only justified because it works - up to a
point. |
|
 |
Approximations: Constant
potential U = U0 = 0 within a crystal with
length L in all directions; U = ¥ outside; only one electron is considered. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Graphic representation of the model.
Note that the electron energy inside the potential well
must be purely kinetic. |
|
|
|
 |
The major formulas and interpretations needed
are: |
 |
Time independent one-dimensional
Schrödinger equation :
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2
2m |
æ
ç
è |
¶2y(x,y,z)
¶x2 |
+ |
¶2y(x,y,z)
¶y2 |
+ |
¶2y(x,y,z)
¶z2 |
ö
÷
ø |
+ U(r) ·
y(x,y,z) |
= |
E · y(x,y,z) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
= 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
= h "dash" = h/2p = Plancks constant/2p.
m = electron mass.
y = wave
function.
E =
total energy =
kinetic energy + potential energy. Here it is identical to the kinetic energy because the potential energy is zero. |
 |
Potential U(x) as
defined above; i.e. U(x) = U0 = const =
0 for 0 £ x
£ L, or ¥ otherwise. |
|
 |
For the (potential) energy, there is always a free
choice of zero point; here it is convenient to put the bottom of the potential
well at zero potential energy. We will, however, change that later on. |
 |
Boundary conditions:
Several choices are possible, here we use
periodic
conditions (also called Born - von Karmann conditions). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Solution (for 3-dimensional case)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| y |
= |
æ
ç
è |
1
L |
ö
÷
ø |
3/2 |
· |
exp (i · k · r) |
|
|
|
| r |
= |
position vector =
(x, y, z) |
| |
|
|
| k |
= |
wavevector =
(kx, ky, kz) |
| |
|
|
| kx |
= |
+/- nx · 2p/L |
| ky |
= |
+/- ny · 2p/L |
| kz |
= |
+/- nz · 2p/L, |
| |
|
|
| nx, ny, nz |
= |
quantum numbers = 0,1,2,3,..., |
| |
|
|
| i |
= |
( 1)1/2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A somewhat
more general form for
crystals with unequal sides can be found in the link. |
 |
There are infinitely many
solutions, and every individual solution is selected or described by a set of
the three quantum numbers nx, ny,
nz. The solution y
describes a plane wave
with amplitude (1/L)3/2
moving in the direction of the wave vector k. |
 |
Next, we extract related quantities of interest in
connection with moving particles or waves: |
|
 |
The wavelength
l of the "electron wave" is given
by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
The momentum
p of the electron is given by |
|
|
|
|
|
| p |
= |
· k |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
From this and with m = electron mass we
obtain the velocity
v of the electron to be |
|
|
|
|
|
| v |
= |
p
m |
= |
·
k
m |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
The numbers
nx, ny,
nz are
quantum
numbers; their values (together with the value of the
spin) are
characteristic for one particular solution of the Schrödinger equation of
the system. A unique set of quantum numbers (alway plus one of the two
possibilities for the spin) describes a state of the electron |
|
 |
Since these quantum numbers only
appear in the wave vector k, one often denotes a
particular wave function by indexing it with k
instead of nx, y, z because a given
k vector denotes a particular solution or
state just as well as the set of the three
quantum numbers. |
|
|
|
|
| ynx, ny, nz(x,y,z) |
= |
yk(x,y,z) = yk(r) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
In other words, in a formal sense we
can regard the wave vector more abstract as a kind of vector quantum number
designating a special solution of the Schrödinger equation for the given
problem. |
 |
Since the total energy
E is identical to the kinetic energy Ekin =
½mv2 = p2/2m, we have |
|
|
|
|
| E = |
2
· k2
2 m |
|
|
|
|
 |
We now have expressed the total energy as a function of the wave vector. Any relation of this kind is called a
dispersion function. Spelt out we
have |
|
|
|
|
|
| E |
= |
2
2me |
· |
æ
ç
è |
2 p
L |
ö
÷
ø |
2 |
· |
æ
è |
nx2
+ ny2
+ nz2 |
ö
ø |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
This is the first important
result: There are only discrete energy
levels for the electron in a box with constant potential that represents the
crystal. |
|
 |
This result (as you simply must believe at this
point) will still be true if we use the
correct potentials, and if we consider
many electrons. The formula, however, i.e.
the relation between energy and wave vectors may become much more complicated. |
|
The boundary conditions chosen and the length
L of the box are somewhat arbitrary. We will see, however, that
they do not matter for the relevant quantities to be derived from this
model. |
|
|
|
 |
Knowing the energy
levels, we can count how many energy levels are contained in an interval
DE at the energy E. This
is best done in k - space or phase
space. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
In phase space a surface of constant energy is a
sphere, is a as schematically shown in the picture. |
|
|
 |
Any "state", i.e. solution of the
Schroedinger equation with a specific k, occupies the volume
given by one of the little cubes in phase space. |
|
|
 |
The number of cubes fitting inside the sphere at
energy E thus is the number of all energy levels up to E. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Counting the number of cells
(each containing one possible state of y) in
an energy interval E, E + DE thus
correspond to taking the difference of the numbers of cubes contained in a
sphere with "radius" E + DE
and E. We thus obtain the density
of states D as |
|
|
|
|
|
| D |
= |
1
V |
· |
N(E, E + DE)
N(E)
DE |
= |
1
V |
· |
dN
dE |
= |
|
1
L3 |
· |
dN
dE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
With N(E) = Number of
states between E = 0 and E per volume unit, and
V = L3 = volume of the crystal. |
 |
Taking into account that every state
(characterized by its set of quantum numbers nx,
ny, nz) can accommodate 2 electrons (one with spin
up; one with spin down), the final formula is |
|
|
|
|
|
| D = |
1
L3 |
· |
dNs
dE |
= |
1
2p2 |
æ
ç
è |
2me
2 |
ö
÷
ø |
3/2 |
· |
E 1/2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
The derivation of this formula and
more to densities of states
(including generating some numbers) can be found in the link. |
 |
Some important points are: |
|
 |
- D(E) is proportional to
E1/2.
- For different (but physically meaningful) boundary conditions we obtain the
same D (see the exercise 2.1 below).
- The artificial length L disappears because we are only
considering specific quantities, i.e. volume densities.
- D is kind of a twofold
density. It is first the density of energy states in an energy interval and second the (trivial) density of
that number in space
|
|
 |
If we fill the available states with the available
electrons at a temperature of 0 K
(since we consider the free electrons of a material this number will be about
1 (or a few) per atom and thus is principially known), we find a special
energy called Fermi energy
EF at
the value where the last electron finds its place. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
In order to get (re)acquainted with the formalism,
we do two simple exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
| Exercise 2.1-1 |
| Solution of the free electron
gas problem with fixed boundary conditions |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
We have the number of energy states
for a given energy interval and want to know how many (charge)
carriers we will find in the same energy interval
in thermal equilibrium. Since we want to
look at particles other than electrons too, but only at charged particles, we
use the term "carrier" here. |
 |
In other words, we want the
distribution of carriers on the available energy levels satisfying three
conditions: |
|
 |
The Pauli exclusion principle: There may be
at most 2 carries per energy state (one with spin "up", one
with spin "down"), not more. |
|
 |
The equilibrium condition: Minimum of the
appropriate thermodynamic potential, here always
the free Enthalpy G (also called
Gibbs
energy). |
|
 |
The conservation of particles
(or charge) condition; i.e.constant number of
carriers regardless of the distribution. |
 |
The mathematical procedure involves a variation
principle of G. The result is the well-known Fermi-Dirac distribution
f(E,T): |
| |
 |
f(E,T) = probability for occupation of (one!)
state at E for the temperature T |
|
|
|
|
|
f(E, T) =
|
1
|
| exp |
æ
è |
E EF
kT |
ö
ø |
+ 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
If you are not very familiar with the
distributions in general or the
Fermi
distribution in particular, read up on it in the (German) link. |
 |
This is the "popular"
version with the Fermi energy
EF as a parameter. In the "correct" version,
we would have the chemical potential
m instead of EF. |
|
 |
Since the Fermi energy is a quantity defined independently of
the equilibrium considerations above, equating EF with
m is only correct at T = 0 K.
Most textbooks emphasize that small differences may occur at larger
temperatures, but do not explain what those differences are. We, like everybody
else, will ignore these fine points and use the term "Fermi Energy" without reservations. |
|
 |
In all experience, many students (and
faculty) of physics or materials science have problems with the concept of the
"chemical potential". This is in
part psychological (we want to do semiconductor physics and not chemistry) but
mostly due to little acquaintance with the subject. The
link provides some
explanations and examples which might help. |
 |
The Fermi-Dirac distribution has some general
properties which are best explained in a graphic representation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
It contains a convenient definition of the Fermi energy: The
energy where exactly half of the available levels are occupied (or would be
occupied if there would be any!) is the Fermi energy: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
The width of "soft zone" is » 4 kT = 1 meV at 3 K, and 103
meV at 300K. |
|
 |
For E EF >>
kT the Boltzmann approximation can be
used: |
|
|
|
|
|
| fB(E,T) |
» |
exp |
E EF
kT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
In this case the probability that a given energy state is
occupied by more than 1 electron is negligible, and the exclusion
principle is not important because there are always plenty of free states
around- the electrons behave akin to classical particles. |
 |
This leads to the final formula
for the incremental number or density of electrons,
dN, in the energy interval E, E +
DE (and, of course, in thermodynamic
equilibrium). |
|
|
|
|
|
| In words: |
Formula |
Density of electrons in the energy interval E,
E + DE =
density of states times probability for
occupancy times energy interval |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
This is an extremely important formula, that is
easily generalized for most everything. The number (or density) of something is
given by the density of available places times the probability of
occupation. |
|
 |
This applies to the number of people found in a given church
or stadium, the number of
photons inside a
"black box", the number of phonons in a crystal, and so on. |
|
 |
The tricky part, of course, is to know the probabilities or
the distribution function in each
case. However, if we do not consider church goers or soccer fans, but only
physical particles (including electrons and holes, but also "quasi-particles" like
phonons,
excitons, ...), there are only two
distribution functions (and the Boltzmann distribution as an approximation):
The Fermi-Dirac distribution for Fermions, and the Bose-Einstein distribution
for Bosons. Mother nature here made life real easy for physicists. |
 |
Since all available electrons N must
be somewhere on the energy scale, we always have a normalization
condition. |
|
|
|
|
|
| N |
= |
¥
ó
õ
0 |
D(E) · f(E,T) · dE |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
© H. Föll