 |
With "optoelectronics" in the context
of this lecture we mean only electronic
devices based on semiconductors where recombination
processes emit light. We call this radiation process
spontaneous emission of light,
because it just happens statistically without any other ingredients but
electrons and holes. |
|
 |
We thus do not (yet) look at the opposite process
- the absorption of light, important in
photo-diodes (or solar
cells as already discussed before). |
|
 |
Transmission
of light in waveguides (which might be integrated on a chip) is also not
considered here. |
 |
We have seen that Silicon is an
indirect semiconductor and
recombination
proceeds via deep levels. The energy released does not produce photons in
an appreciable amount and Si is therefore not useful for optoelectronic
applications. |
|
 |
This is, however, not a general truth. While
recombination via deep levels as the
required third partner does not produce light, indeed, recombination proceeding
via some other third partner may. We will see that there are indirect
semiconductors that emit enough light to be useful for practical
applications. |
|
 |
But generally, we are looking for direct semiconductors where it can be expected that
recombination does result in light production. |
 |
This leads us to some general
questions which can be translated to requests for material properties. Let us
consider the more fundamental ones: |
 |
The first question is: What is the wavelength of the light produced? |
|
 |
If the light is produced by direct band-to-band
recombination, we have of course |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
With cmat =
n · l, and
cmat = velocity of light in the material = c0
/n (with c0 = velocity of light in vacuum,
and n = refractive index of the material), we obtain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
If the radiant recombination proceeds from some
other energy states we simply replace EC
EV by DE,
the relevant energy difference. |
 |
This leaves us with two material
questions: |
|
 |
First, we are
asking for the value of DE, or in most
cases EC EV, for
optoelectronic materials. The answer comes from the band diagram and from finer
details, still to be considered. |
|
 |
Second, we
now must know the (complex)
refractive index of the material.
This is not only important for the value of the wave length
in the material, but especially for the
transmission of light out of the material -
where the difference in the refractive indices between two materials is a prime
property of interest. The refractive index of a
semiconductor is a new property that we did not address before. |
 |
The second question coming to
mind is: How much light is produced by
recombination, or more precisely, what is the
quantum efficiency
hqu, defined as the fraction of
recombination events that produces light? |
|
 |
For this we have to look at the various pathways
open for recombination. In the preceding chapters we have discussed
recombination in
general and for one particular
mechanism in
detail. |
|
 |
However, there might be several mechanisms for
recombination open to minority carriers, and only one might produce light. We
thus must consider recombination in optoelectronic materials in more
detail. |
 |
Third, we may wonder about the absolute intensity or even more specific,
the intensity density we can
produce. |
|
 |
In other words, how many light producing
recombination events per second are attainable in a given volume of material? What is the limit and
which factors determine it? |
|
 |
Or, reformulated in technical terms. How do we
produce a large non-equilibrium density of minorities (and majorities, too)?
How do we inject electronically (by currents driven by external voltages) high
densities of carriers in small volumes with no way out but recombination? |
|
 |
This question leads to the overwhelmingly complex
issue of heterojunctions, quantum-wells, and the like. |
 |
Now that we produced light, we must ask our fourth question: How do we
get it out of the semiconductor? Which percentage of the light
produced will actually escape - some light, for sure, will be absorbed in the material. |
|
 |
Will it come out in all directions, with a
preferred direction, or even as a LASER beam? |
|
 |
What do we have to do to optimize whatever we
want? |
|
 |
How do we meet the two basic requirements for
Laser activity - inversion and feed-back? (what ever that means; we will come back
to it). |
 |
We
now ask the fifth question:
What can we do to modify the wavelength of the emitted
light? |
|
 |
Can we "tune" a given semiconductor, or
mix different ones? What are the criteria for success? |
 |
And finally, for question number six,
we must consider the technology: How do we make the
needed materials and devices ? |
|
 |
What technologies exist, what are the pro and
cons? |
|
 |
What can we use from Si technology? What
kind of technologies do we need that are specific to optoelectronics ? |
 |
All these questions are interrelated;
very often we can not deal with just one at a time. In other words, if you
optimize one property, you will change most of the others, too. |
|
 |
Selecting materials and processes for an
optimized device is a complex process and still a topic of front-end
research. |
|
 |
While much progress has been made during the last
20 years or so, there is still no cheap and reliable blue semiconductor Laser although first prototypes based on the fairly
new technical semiconductor GaN
(Gallium nitride) have been introduced around 1998. |
|
 |
It is a safe bet that we will see a lot more
progress for the next 20 years, and that it will come from rather
involved physics and materials research employing quite a bit of quantum
theory, new concepts like "photonic
crystals" and "spintronics" - buzz words that you, the
student, may not have heard yet, but that may well become part of your
professional career. |
|
|
|
 |
Pondering the questions from above,
it becomes clear very quickly that we need several suitable semiconductors to
cover all aspects of optoelectronics. |
|
 |
It also becomes clear that we have to look at
more properties than we did for Si - the dielectric constant, e.g., is a prime parameter
now. |
|
 |
The value of the band gap, too, is now of prime
importance (We wouldn't have cared much if it would have been somewhat
different in Si!). |
|
 |
The precise mechanisms for recombination are a
prime matter of interest. In Si, all that counted was that you had some,
but not too many deep level around midgap, giving a large recombination life
time. With optoelectronics we may have to make sure that recombination proceeds
exactly as needed. |
|
 |
Let's start with looking at
major semiconductors and their properties in detail |
|
|
|
|
|
| Properties |
Si |
Ge |
GaAs |
InP |
InSb |
In0,53Ga0,47As |
GaP |
GaN |
SiC |
Diamond |
Remarks |
| Crystal |
Unit weight
[mol] |
29,09 |
|
144,63 |
145,79 |
|
168,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
Density
[g/cm3] |
2,33 |
|
5,32 |
5,49 |
|
5,49 |
|
|
3.166 (cubic)
3.211 (hex) |
3,51 |
|
| Crystal
structure |
Diamond |
Diamond |
Sphalerite |
Sphalerite |
Sphalerite |
Sphalerite |
|
|
Many variants
cubic, hex, rhombohedral |
Diamond |
|
Lattice constant
[nm] |
0,5431 |
0,565 |
0,565 |
0,587 |
0,648 |
0,5867 |
|
|
a = 0,30
c many values |
|
|
| Transport properties |
| Band gap [eV] |
1,12 |
0,66 |
1,42 |
1,35 |
0,17 |
0,75 |
2,26 |
|
2.39 - 3.26 |
5.47 |
|
| Type |
Indirect |
Indirect |
Direct |
direct |
|
direct |
indirect |
|
Indirect |
|
|
Effective e- mass
[m*/m0] |
0,98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0,24 - 0,7 |
|
|
Effective
h+ mass
[m*/m0]
light
heavy |
0,16
0,49 |
|
0,082
0,45 |
0,12
0,56 |
7,3 |
0,051
0,50 |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
| Neff in C
[1018cm3] |
28
(32) |
10,4 |
0,47 |
0,54 |
0,042 |
0,21 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Neff in V
[1018cm-3] |
10
(18) |
6 |
7 |
2,9 |
|
7,4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ni [106cm3] |
6 600
13.000 |
|
2,2 |
5,7 |
|
63 000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mobility (undoped)
[cm2/Vs]
µn
µh |
1 500
450 |
1 900
3 900 |
8500
450 |
5 000
200 |
80 000
1 250 |
14 000
400 |
300
150 |
|
500 - 1 000
20 - 50 |
200 - 2 200
1.800 - 2 100 |
|
Lifetime (general)
[µs] |
2500 |
|
0,01 |
0,005 |
|
0,02 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mechanism of
luminescence |
None |
|
band-band |
band-band |
|
band-band |
exciton-band
if doped |
|
|
|
|
| Dielectric properties |
| Dielectric constant |
11,9 |
16 |
13,1 |
12,4 |
17,7 |
13,7 |
11,1 |
|
9.7 - 10 |
5.5 |
|
Break through field
strength
[kV/cm] |
300 |
|
350 |
400 |
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Specific intrinsic
resistance
[MWcm] |
0,2 |
|
310 |
11 |
|
0,0008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Electron affinity
[eV] |
4,0 |
4,05 |
4,07 |
4,4 |
4,59 |
4,63 |
4,3 |
|
|
|
|
| Thermal Properties |
Expansion
coefficient
[106 oC1] |
2,6 |
|
6,86 |
4,75 |
|
5,66 |
5,3 |
|
|
1 |
|
Therm. conductivity
[W/cmK] |
1,5 |
|
0,45 |
0,68 |
|
0,05 |
|
|
5.0 |
22 |
Cu: 4.01 |
Specific heat
[J/goC] |
0,7 |
|
0,35 |
0,31 |
|
0,29 |
|
|
0.671 |
0.428 |
Cu: 0.38 |
Melting point
[oC] |
1 412 |
937 |
1 238 |
1 062 |
527 |
970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© H. Föll