 |
When we first introduced phase diagrams, we
assumed that the two components mix well, i.e. that they "like" each
other. |
| |
 |
In other words, the free enthalpy for any mix and
temperature is always lower that that of
equal amounts of the pure components |
|
 |
If we examine the Cu - Ni case
used as example, we see
that in terms of only the enthalpy H - i.e. the binding energy
between the atoms - Cu indeed "likes" Ni, but Ni
is not so happy with Cu atom as neighbors. |
|
 |
We see that, because the enthalpy at the Cu side goes
down with some Ni atoms added, while
on the Ni side it goes up. However,
the effect is small, because the total enthalpy curve is close to a straight
line between the two extremes, and a straight line simply indicates total
indifference as to one's neighbor. |
 |
The entropy always increases with mixing; in
consequence the free enthalpy for the Cu
- Ni example is always "hanging down" for the temperature range
considered (only at extremely low temperatures it must eventually come
up). |
 |
What happens if we try to mix atoms that really
hate each other; i.e. the enthalpy curve goes up from both ends if we add
A or B? |
|
 |
The answer - you guessed it (hopefully) - is clear: You get
eutectic and peritectic behavior. |
|
 |
How? That's what we are going to look at in this module,
however, because it tends to get a bit involved, only in cursory way. |
|
 |
First let's look at eutectic behavior. For that we only need
to go through the possibilities inherent in the superposition of an
"up" enthalpy H curve with a "down"
TS curve; what happens then is shown below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
It's rather obvious. While for high temperatures
the TS term still may win; i.e. the free enthalpy is
completely "hanging through" with only one minimum, the situation changes with decreasing
temperature T. |
| |
 |
The free enthalpy curve will start to
bend upwards somewhere in the middle. It now has two minima (for solid phases), and that means that a
mixture of two solid phases is energetically favorable. |
|
 |
A "miscibility gap" develops at some temperature
TMis and spreads with decreasing T. This
produces the light green area in the schematic phase diagram above. |
|
 |
The phase diagram shown also
indicates that the area of complete miscibility in the L +
a will no longer be a simple lens, but may be
somewhat distorted, too |
 |
The next step is easy to imagine. Just suppose
that TMis is larger than the liquidus temperature at
some concentration. |
|
|
|
 |
What you would get then is something like
this: |
|
|
 |
You end up with an eutectic phase diagram by
necessity! |
|
|
 |
Of course, the details of the two
"ears" with the phase mix liquid and solid depends on the particulars
of the system |
|
|
 |
And for very peculiar systems, one
"ear" flips down to produce a peritectic phase diagram! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All that's needed for that is that the melting
points of the two components are quite different, so one will be smaller than
the equilibrium temperature for the three phases in contact. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
What you get then looks like this: |
|
|
 |
It is rather straight-forward; even in the
details, but a closer discussion would still need a lot of words and
drawings. |
|
|
 |
The important thing to note is that everything
follows from the interaction energy of A and B atoms (or
components, if you allow molecules for A and B, too). |
|
|
 |
Add the entropy of mixing, and you can actually
calculate phase diagrams - including rather complicated ones. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Nobody says it's easy - but by now, standard
software is available that produces binary phase diagrams routinely. |
|
|
© H. Föll