|
This module will be
in English because it is also used for other Hyperscripts. |
|
|
 |
One of the more exciting (or
frightening, depending on one's perspective to science) developments in
understanding quasicrystals was the insight that quasicrystals can be
constructed by projecting a perfect lattice
in 6-dimensional space onto a properly
chosen 3-dimensional subspace (which is the kind of space you and I
know). |
| |
 |
The gist of this outrageous statement is actually
far easier to understand than it appears at first. For that we look at a simple
analogue: We project a perfect 2-dimensional
lattice on a 1-dimensional
subspace. How this is done is shown in the figure below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Starting from a simple 2-dimensional cubic
lattice, we draw a straight line xp at an angle a
to the x-direction. The decisive point is that tan
a must be an irrational number, e.g. (5)½
or p/3 or whatever. This makes sure that
xp will not touch another
lattice point ever. |
|
 |
We than define an area (yellow) by drawing a line
parallel to xp at some distance T , which can be an
arbitrary number. |
|
 |
Some lattice points will now be found within the
yellow area, we project their position onto xp. |
 |
The sequence of points obtained that
way (shown at the bottom as the sequence of green "diamonds") is - by
definition if you think about it - aperiodic; it will never repeat. |
|
 |
But it is not completely random either. There are
only two different distances between points, their sequence just does not
follow a periodic pattern. |
|
 |
We have actually produced a
one-dimensional quasicrystal. |
 |
Now lets take a six-dimensional space and construct a cubic
primitive lattice. No mathematician has the slightest problem doing that - you
simply get a "hypercube" elementary cell with 64 corners and
so on. |
| |
 |
Now lets take a regular three-dimensional space.
We make sure that the three-dimensional space is oriented relative to the
six-dimensional space in such a way, that the six base vectors of the hypercube
are projected onto the three-dimensional space with the fivefold symmetry of an
icosahedra. (An icosahedra is one of those
regular "eders" with triangular faces, where always five triangles
sort of group around an axis with five-fold symmetry. |
|
 |
Interestingly, instead of some tan
a the number N = [1 +
(5)½] appears - which is the "magic number of the
golden ratio". This
may or may not mean something special. |
|
 |
Now you define some neighborhood around your
three-dimensional space and start projecting - you will get the exact
arrangement of atoms in a real three-dimensional quasicrystal. |
 |
Don't worry if you can not imagine
all this - nobody can. |
|
 |
Only worry if you can't see that there is a
sophisticated, but nevertheless rather clear-cut mathematical procedure of how
to construct a three-dimensional point sequence by all this hypercube
projection stuff. |
|
 |
If you did not worry so far, you should now,
pondering the question: What does it
mean? |
 |
Again, who knows for sure? But we do
know that there is some meaning. Lets just look at one example. |
|
 |
In three-dimensional quasicrystals we find some
entities that look and behave exactly like
dislocations (a one-dimensional
defect in three-dimensional lattices).
These whatever-they-are entities come into being after some deformation like
real dislocations, they move through the
quasicrystal like real dislocation, they
look like real dislocations in the electron
microscope - but they simply cannot be real
dislocations because real dislocations can
only exist in periodic lattices. |
|
 |
Turns out they are dislocations in the
six-dimensional periodic lattice - no
problem to define dislocations there. What we see is sort of what is left in
the three-dimensional space where atoms live (not to mention you and me). |
|
 |
And while real dislocations are always characterized by their
Burgers vector - just a
regular vector with three components - the quasicrystal sort-of-dislocations
need a vector with six components for their
characterization. |
|
 |
Mercifully enough, it turns out that the
particulars of the projection scheme always allow to decompose the one six-dimensional Burgers vector into two three dimensional ones. These two regular
vectors have a precise meaning as to what this dislocation-liek thing does to
the quasicrystal when it moves through it. |
 |
All in all - quasicrystals, quite
unexpectedly, link materials science with rather involved and rather unexpected
math. It will be exciting to witness what will come from all this during the
next 10 or 20 years. |
|
|
© H. Föll (MaWi 1 Skript)