|
After we have produced all kinds of
layer, we must now proceed to the
structure
module of our basic process cycle. First we discuss
etching techniques. |
|
 |
Lets see what it means to produce a structure by
etching. Lets make, e.g., a contact hole in a somewhat advanced process (and do
some of the follow-up processes for clarity). |
|
 |
What the stucture contains may look like
this: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Obviously, before you deposit the
Ti/TiN diffusion barrier
layer (and then the W, and so on), you must etch a hole through
3 oxide layers and an Si3N4 - and here we
don't care why we have all those layers. (The right hand side of the picture
shows a few things that can go wrong in the contact making process, but that
shall not concern us at present). |
 |
There are some obvious requirements
for the etching of this contact hole that also come up for most other etching
processes. |
|
 |
1. You only want to etch straight down - not in the lateral direction. In
other words, you want strongly anisotropic
etching that only affects the bottom of the contact hole to be formed,
but not the sidewalls (which are, after all, of the same material). |
|
 |
2. You want to stop as soon as you reach the Si substrate.
Ideally, whatever you do for etching will not affect Si (or whatever
material you want not to be affected). In other words, you want a large
selectivity (= ratio of etch
rates). |
|
 |
3. You also want reasonable etching rates (time is money), the ability to etch
through several different layers in
one process (as above), no damage of any kind (including rough surfaces) to the
layer where you stop, and sometimes extreme
geometries (e.g. when you etch a trench for a capacitor: 0,8 µm in
diameter and 8 µm deep) - and you want perfect homogeneity and reproducibility all the time (e.g.
all the about 200.000.000.000 trenches on one 300 mm wafer containg 256 Mbit
DRAMs must be identical to the ones on the other 500 - 1000 wafers you etch today, and to the thousands you etched before, or are going to etch in
the future). |
 |
Lets face it: This is tough! There is no single technique that
meets all the requirements for all situations. |
|
 |
Structure etching thus is almost always a search
for the best compromise, and new etching techniques are introduced all the
time. |
|
 |
Here we can only scratch at the surface and look
at the two basic technologies in use: Chemical or wet
etching and plasma or dry
etching. |
|
|
|
|
Chemical etching is simple: Find some
(liquid) chemical that dissolves the layer to be etched, but that does not
react with everything else. |
|
 |
Sometimes this works, sometimes it doesn`t.
Hydrofluoric acid (HF), for example will dissolve
SiO2, but not Si - so there is an etching solution for
etching SiO2 with extreme selectivity to Si. |
|
 |
The other way around does not work: Whatever
dissolves Si, will always dissolve SiO2, too. At best
you may come up with an etchant that shows somewhat different etching rates,
i.e. some (poor) selectivity. |
 |
Anyway, the thing to remember is:
Chemical etchants, if existing, can provide extremely good selectivity and thus
meet our second request from above. |
|
 |
How about the first request, anisotropy? Well, as you guessed: It
is rotten, practically non-existent. A chemical etchant always dissolves the
material it is in contact with, the forming of a contact hole would look like
this: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
There is a simple and painful
consequence: As soon as your feature size is about 2 µm or smaller,
forget chemical structure etching. |
|
 |
Really? How about making the opening in the mask
smaller, accounting for the increase in lateral dimensions? |
|
 |
You could do that - it would work. But it would
be foolish: If you can make the opening
smaller, you also want your features smaller. In real life, you put up a
tremendous effort to make the contact hole opening as small as you can, and you
sure like hell don't want to increase it by the structure etching! |
 |
Does that mean that there is no
chemical etching in Si microelectronics? Far from it. There just is no
chemical structure etching any more. But
there are plenty of opportunities to use chemical etches (cf. the
statistics to the
16 Mbit DRAM process). Lets list a few: |
|
 |
Etching off whole
layers. Be it some sacrificial layer after it fulfilled its purpose,
the photo resist, or simply all the CVD layers or thermal oxides which
are automatically deposited on the wafer backside, too - they all must come off
eventually and this is best done by wet chemistry. |
|
 |
Etching coarse
structures, e.g. the opening in some protective layers to the large
Al pads which are necessary for attaching a wire to the outside
world. |
|
 |
Etching off unwanted native oxide on all Si or poly-Si
layers that were exposed to air for more than about 10 min. |
|
 |
All cleaning
steps may be considered to be an extreme form of chemical etching.
Etching off about 1,8 nm of native oxide might be considered cleaning,
and a cleaning step where nothing is changed at the surface, simply has no
effect. |
 |
While these are not the exciting
process modules, experienced process engineers know that this is where trouble
lurks. Many factories have suffered large losses because the yield was down -
due to some problem with wet
chemistry. |
 |
A totally new field, just making it
into production for some special applications, is
electrochemical etching. A few
amazing (and not yet well understood) things can be done that way; the link
provides some samples. |
|
|
© H. Föll (Electronic Materials - Script)