|
How to get the chips on the wafer? In
order to produce a CMOS structure as shown before, we essentially have to go back and
forth between two two basic process modules: |
 |
Material module |
|
 |
Deposit some material on the surface of the wafer
(e.g. SiO2), or |
|
 |
Modify material already there (e.g. by
introducing the desired doping), or |
|
 |
Clean the material present, or |
|
 |
Measure something relative to the material (e.g.
its thickness), or |
|
 |
- well, there are a few more points like this but
which are not important at this stage. |
 |
Structuring
module |
|
 |
Transfer the desired structure for the relevant
material into some light sensitive layer called a photo-resist or simply
resist (which is a very special electronic material!) by lithography, i.e. by projecting a slide (called a
mask or more generally reticle) of the structure onto the light sensitive
layer, followed by developing the resist akin to a conventional photographic
process, and then: |
|
 |
Transfer the structure from the resist to the
material by structure etching or other
techniques. |
 |
Repeat the
cycle more than 20 times - and you
have a wafer with fully processed chips. |
|
 |
This is shown schematically in the drawing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
For the most primitive transistor imaginable, a
minimum of 5 lithographic steps are required. Each process module
consists of many individual process steps
and it is the art of process
integration to find the optimal combination and sequence of process
steps to achieve the desired result in the most economic way. |
 |
It needs a lot of process steps -
most of them difficult and complex - to make a chip. |
|
 |
Even the most simple 5 mask process
requires about 100 process steps. |
|
 |
A 16 Mbit DRAM needs about 19 masks
and 400 process steps. |
 |
To give an idea what
this contains, here is a list of the ingredients for a 16 Mbit DRAM at
the time of its introduction to the market (with time it tends to become
somewhat simpler): |
|
 |
57 layers are deposited (such as
SiO2 (14 times), Si3N4,
Al, ...). |
|
 |
73 etching steps are necessary (54
with "plasma etching", 19 with wet chemistry). |
|
 |
19 lithography steps are required
(including deposition of the resist, exposure, and development). |
|
 |
12 high temperature processes (including
several oxidations) are needed. |
|
 |
37 dedicated cleaning
steps are built in; wet chemistry occurs 150 times altogether. |
|
 |
158 measurements take place to assure that
everything happened as designed. |
 |
A
more detailed rendering can
be found in the link. |
 |
Two questions come
to mind: |
|
 |
How long does it take to
do all this? The answer is: weeks if everything always works and you never have
to wait, and months considering that there
is no such thing as an uninterrupted process flow all the time. |
|
 |
How large is the success
rate? Well, lets do a back-of-the-envelope calculation and assume
that each process has a success rate of x %. The overall
yield Y of working devices is then
Y = (x/100)N % with N = number of
process steps. With N = 450 or 200 we have
|
|
|
|
|
|
| x |
Y for N = 450 |
Y for N = 200 |
| 95% |
9,45 · 109 % |
3,51 · 103 % |
| 99% |
1,09 % |
13,4 % |
| 99,9% |
63,7 % |
81,9 % |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
N = 200 might be more realistic, because
many steps (especially controls) do not influence the yield very much. |
 |
But whichever way
we look at these numbers, there is an unavoidable
conclusion: Total perfection at each process step is absolutely
necessary! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© H. Föll (Electronic Materials - Script)