Bi-Metal Swords; Details
Debunking Bronze Swords with an Iron Core
|As we know very well, the Luristanis
around 1930 produced some much needed income by unearthing thousands of
remarkable bronze objects plus a 100 or so iron mask swords from the graves of
their ancestors. Less well known is that local yokels all over "Western
Asia", in particulate in what is now Norther Iran, did the same thing.
From todays point of view (see below) they must have unearthed a lot of
bi-metal swords with only the bronze hilt left because the iron blade was
completely corroded. The iron tang inside the hilt was protected and still
intact, though. They also found a lot of bronze blades with no good hilt
Naue I type).
Those incomplete bronze objects did not look so hot and did not fetch a good prize. So an idea was born: Let's combine the two parts to a good-looking all-bronze sword albeit with an iron core in the hilt.
|Drill a shallow hole into the hilt, taking out some iron, insert the bronze blade (after making it fit to the hilt) and solder it in. Smooth the joint over a bit and cover the afflicted region with green paint that looks like the patina of the rest. You can easily produce a bunch of nice-looking bronze swords like the ones shown below:|
|These swords were actually bought by Japanese archaeologists at the market in Teheran; assuming that they were "honest" bronze swords. Research later showed that they had some iron in their hilts. You don't need sophisticate methods for this, having a magnet stick to the hilt gives a rather clear hint.|
|The scientists, instead of noticing that they fell for a scam, proposed theories about, e.g., ritual uses of bronze swords with an iron core in the hilt, etc. Finally the paper cited above appeared and described these swords as the "pastiches" that they are. A pastiche, as Wikipedia knows, is a work of visual art, literature, theatre, or music that imitates the style or character of the work of one or more other artists. Unlike parody, pastiche celebrates, rather than mocks, the work it imitates. The swords above imitate real old bronze swords and celebrate them, in a fashion.|
|To an amateur like
me it is inconceivable how serious scientists (who shall remain unnamed here)
fell for "bronze swords with an iron core" around the year 2000.
There is no conceivable practical reason why one should produce such a thing,
so it was (routinely) assumed that they served for some "ceremonial
To an amateur like me it is refreshing, however, to see that serious archaeologists obviously don't read the relevant literature and that the referees of the respective articles did not catch on either. I can state this because there were at least one publication before the year 2000 that pointed out that pastiches existed in the museum of the authors and how one could find that out. It appeared in 1969 form the Penn State Museum1). Another one was published in in 2010 by the British Museum2)
Here is a picture from the British Museum paper. It shows the iron rod and the solder that connects parts of a bronze hilt plus bronze blade to the hilt of the original bi-metal sword
|It is of fleeting interest that the pastiche producers chose to construct a double-disc pommel sword. Why? I don't know. Maybe because the hilt actually was from a double-disc pommel sword with an iron blade?|
|I have no more to say at present (Oct. 21). That's a pity because there is much more to bi-metal swords; I just don't know it (yet). Maybe because I haven't done enough literature research or simply because a lot is still unknown, waiting for future research.|
Wever: A Persian puzzle. A bronze sword form Teheran
Penn State Museum "Expedition"
Fall 1969, p.25
and La Niece: New light on old swords from Iran
British Museum Technical Research Bulletin (4) (p.95-101)
Archetype Publications, London, 2010
First Iron Swords - Bi-Metal Swords
First Iron Swords - Bi-Metal Swords
First Iron Swords - Double-Disc Hilt Sword
First Iron Swords
First Iron Swords - Literature Digest
© H. Föll (Iron, Steel and Swords script)