Blooms and Bloomeries
|Around the year 2000 I wrote my first short module about ancient iron and steel as part of one of my "academic" hyperscripts. In those ancient times there was practially nothing in the Internet about that topic (there wasn't even an Internet a few years before that). Googling for "steel history" invariably put my module on the first place in the following years. Checking right now (Nov. 2013), it actually still makes second place.|
|But now you have plenty of other entries, including sites of
many professional and amateur smiths who make wonderful things by emulating old technologies.
Moreover, lots of people (mostly male) have fun on weekends by throwing together a bloomery,
trying to make some iron / steel. Either just as a fun thing to do (often, it seems, with
the secondary goal to prove that you need quantities
of beer for making iron) or as project for youth groups, school classes, or other more
or less organized hordes. |
Some go for one try and typically do not produce much iron or a nice bloom but have fun anyway. Some, however, get ambitious, keep going, and develop tremendous "hands on" experience, producing large and rather good blooms.
Search the Net yourself and you will find plenty.
In what follows I just show some blooms and schematic drawings of bloomeries to illustrate a few points made in the backbone.
|Blooms (German: Luppe)|
|The first picture shows modern blooms. The top two pictures show what you get
if you let your bloom cool to room temperature without "working" it (have it "wrought")
while still hot. You wouldn't know that there is a lot of iron in these ugly bastards.
The lower two blooms are still hot, and you can get an idea why in English this lump of metal might be called bloom = blossom of a plant. In reality, however, it is far more likely that the name goes back to the Old English "bloma" = "lump of metal".
|The bloom in the lower right picture
was split while still hot because it was too large for banging it up with a human-wielded
hammer. This is a very professional bloom, made by Lee Sauder and Skip Williams in their Little
Princess / Rockbridge bloomery. Little wonder! It resulted from experiment No. 84; those guys
are experts by now. |
Smelting datas were: Charge Interval 10 minutes, total ore weight 45 lbs = 20.4 kg, duration 4 hours 20 minutes from first ore charge to bloom removal. Bloom weight 18 lbs = 8 kg. Assuming that the ore "richness" was around 60 %, this amounts to an efficiency around 65 % - which is very good!
|Next we see a slightly rusty bloom, probably not condensed by hammering, that was cut open to reveal the internal structure. Big lumps of charcoal are stuck inside.|
|The sectioned blooms below show the "spongy" nature of all blooms. The same question as for swiss cheese comes up: How do the holes get into the cheese / bloom? For swiss cheese we know (Look up "Ostwald ripening"), for blooms I'm not so sure. The holes might have been made by charcoal now burnt off or fallen out, by slag, or by ???|
|Here are some old blooms. Not all that old - Charlemagne wielded a magical sword around this time in Europe. The interesting parts about these blooms is that they are reported to contain 2 % - 4 % carbon. I'm not sure that I believe that - at least the 4 % bloom would have melted.|
|Bloomeries (German: Rennofen)|
|Bloomeries from the outside look rather unassuming, see below. Watching a working one from the inside would be far more interesting but for obvious reasons nobody has managed to do that yet. That's why we make "schematic drawings" that always involve some guessing and uncertainities.|
|Here are two quite similar "schematics". They can serve nicely to addres a few problems found with most of those schematic drawings. Can you see some?|
|Here is a list of questionable
|I'm not trying to put blame on somebody. Whowever made these picture was aware of the fact that you just can't get everything right in schematic drawings. We had the same formalistic problem with schematic drawings of crystals. The real problem is that people looking at the pictures are tempted to see it as the real thing.|
|Here is a beauty; it illustrates my
"theoretical" concept of having the part close to the stack walls much cooler
than the inside. It was conceived after something R. Pleiner
, a very well-known archeometallurgist, must have published. |
Notice that ore and charcoal are not layered.
coming down on the outside stay much cooler then the ones in the middle and thus might make
it down without becoming re-oxidized to form blooms below and opposite the tuyere (or all
around the wall?). |
It is a nice touch that the temperature (in oC) and the various chemical reactions for producing iron, cementite and slag are shown. However, the reactions for turning iron back into an oxide are missing. They would take place in the white "1400 (oC)" zone at the tuyere mouth.
What keeps the burden from falling down, and what we have on the very bottom of the slag pit is a bit unclear, though.
|Here is a "Tylecote bloomery", after the great old man of experimental iron archeometallurgy.|
|Once more the mechanics of keeping the burden from falling down are not so clear. As a new feature we have some unreacted charcoal at the far side of the tuyere, indicating that opposite the tuyere it is much colder than in the middle.|
|Finally a more "modern" bloomery made from masonry stones and thus obviously not given to full destruction after every run. It has several tuyeres.|
|For unclear reasons it smelts very asymmetrically. The bloom is on the opposite side of the (main) tuyere and rather high up. Several types of slag exist. Running (= rennen, therefore Rennofen) slag and furnace slag, obviously the more viscous kind that doesn't run out. Then there are unreacted charcoals at the bottom.|
|One might deduce one thing from all these variations and from the results of all those enthusiasts out there doing smelting experiments: What is going on inside a bloomery is very complex if looked at in some details. But as long as you do not stray too far from some simple rules, chances are good that your smelter will produce some iron even if you don't know a thing about the details. The efficiency of production might be lousy, and the quality of your iron might be abominable, but iron you will get.|
|It's almost like making a baby. Follow a few rules (mostly
for finding a willing mate) and chances are that it will work - even if the two of you don't
have the faintest idea of what exactly is going on if you look at details. |
A major difference between iron and baby making is that a lot of beer doesn't help all that much for the latter task (just believe me here).
|Sorry - I almost forgot: What keeps the burden up there? Nothing much in a bloomery. It just hangs in there as gravity demands. That's why you have charcoal in the bottom, possibly submerged in liquid slag if there is enough weight from the top (otherwise charcoal would swim on slag like styrofoam on water). In the huge modern blast furnaces we can't have that. That's why the have a specific shape with friction keeping the burden in place; look it up here . We also need to use coke instead of charcoal; the latter could simply not take the weight without crumbling.|
Some Old Names Around Steel and Iron
Lee Sauder and Skip Williams Smelt Iron
Early Pyrotechnolgy - 2. First Technical Uses
Old Sagas, Heroes and Swords
Smelting Science - 5. Smelting Details 2
Smelting Science - 3. Smelter Technology
Free Enthalpy of Reduction Processes
© H. Föll (Iron, Steel and Swords script)