 |
While our basic experiment of putting some
surface charge on a semiconductor surface that is insulated by a (fictive) very
thin featureless insulator is simple, the necessary solutions of the
Poisson equation were not. |
|
 |
Special cases, centered around some basic assumptions and
concommitant mathematical approximations, had to be constructed and were
treated separately: |
|
 |
and most of them proved to be rather tedious. |
|
 |
Fortunately, given the tremendous importance of these cases
for semiconductor technology, other people have looked at this problem in great
detail, and here we are just looking at some major results for the general
case. |
 |
Here we put everything together again. The
essential picture shows the maximum amount
of band bending (i.e. at x = 0 where we have our external surface
charge) as a function of the surface charge (always proprotional to the
external voltage). |
|
 |
The curve obtained from a proper solution of
the complete Poisson
equation must contain as parameters the doping
concentration and the temperature - the
Debye length
in other words. |
|
 |
Here is one version, calculated for p-type Si with an acceptor concentration of
1015 cm3 (i.e. a typical doping
concentration corresponding to a resistivity of about
1 Wcm. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© H. Föll