|
|
 |
Wer Feynman aus seinen populärwissenschaftlichen
Büchern kennt, weiß, daß er es als persönliche Niederlage
empfunden haben muß, das Pauli-Prinzip nicht "erklären" zu
können. In den "Lectures"
(Band 3; Kapitel 4-3) schreibt er: |
|
|
|
|
|
This brings up an interesting question: Why is it that
particles with half-integral spin are Fermi particles (...) whereas particles
with integral spin are Bose particles (...)?
We apologize for the fact that we can not give you an
elementary explanation.
An explanation has been worked out by Pauli from complicated arguments from
quantum field theory and relativity. He has shown that the two must necessarily
go together, but we have not been able to find a way to reproduce his arguments
on an elementary level. It appears to be one of the few places in physics where
there is a rule which can be stated very simply, but for which no one has found
a simple and easy explanation. (...)
This probably means that we do not have a complete understanding of the
fundamental principle involved. For the moment, you will just have to take it
as one of the rules of the world. |
|
|
|
|
|
So be it! |
|
 |
Wer es aber trotzdem ein bißchen genauer wissen will, der möge
den Link betätigen |
|
|
|
© H. Föll
2.1.5 Lösungen der Schrödingergleichung und Aufbau aller Atome
Zum Index