4.3 The Second Law
4.3.1 Nirvana for Crystals
|Peter W. Atkins, a well-known textbook and public science writer, has put it this way: "When you first encounter the SECOND LAW, you ought to kneel down and worship".
|He is right, up to a point. Since I'm a cool and tolerant guy, I let you keep worshiping whatever deity or deities you presently like best. I only request that you should now ponder the essential "why" question:
|You may ask your deity of choice for an answer, or go for my answer, which is: it's all in the second law of thermodynamics or second law, for short.
|Now, if there is a second law, there ought to be a first one. There is a first law of thermodynamics, indeed. I've already
The first law simply states that energy is conserved, and that heat is a form of energy.
It's nothing but the good old energy conservation law, just including heat as a form of energy.
|For example, the first law states that you can't get more mechanical energy out of your car engine than you put chemical energy in (in the form of the bonding energy of gasoline and oxygen).
|In colloquial terms the first law states that you can't win forever, that somebody
always looses if you win.
This is depressing, especially if you are the loser; sometime also known as tax payer or believer of financial gurus. It is essentially the same as saying that there is no such thing as a free lunch, and we already know that as the first law of economics.
|The second law makes things even worse. It says that you can't even get all the energy contained in your gasoline transformed into mechanical energy; it will always be less.
|Quite a lot less, in fact. For example, if your car engine transforms just 50
% of the energy contained in the fuel to forward motion, it's doing extremely well.
In colloquial terms, while the first law says that you can't win on the long run; the second law states that you can't even break even.
In other words: there is not only no free lunch, you don't even get
|The first and second law can be expressed in many smart quips butfar more importantalso in precise equations.
|With the first and second law you can calculate precisely what can be achieved with all kinds of machinery where energy is jiggled aroundsteam engines of old, your car engine, airplane turbines, an electric generator. Provided, of course, you know your calculus, including partial differential equations, and so on.
|And what, you might ask a bit piqued, does all that have to do with our "why" question from above?
|Well - everything! Let's formulate the second law in a way where we can use itbut still without equations. I promised.
|If the system ever achieves this most stable and most preferred state, and most of the time it will not, it will not "do" anything anymore, it just "is".
|This is very easy to understand. If you (the system or you, personally) actually
do something, things must change. If they don't, you might as well have spared yourself
So if you do something while you are already in the best possible state you can be in, you can only change it to a less desirable state, so you better stop doing altogether.
If you are not in this best-of-all-state, then you do whatever it takes to get there.
|This best-of-all-states is known among connoisseurs as: "absolute minimum of the "free enthalpy", or "thermodynamic equilibrium ".
|I thought you should have seen those fancy words at least once. I will give this "absolute minimum and so on" state a better name here. I call this best-of-all states, where everything is peaceful and nothing changes anymore, by its true name:
|Nirvana will be obtained
if you keep your energy as low as sensible at all temperatures while allowing for increasing
disorder as the temperature rises.
Now I have connected two magic words that make for real (as opposed to magical) swords:
|The rule is, and I want you to read that out loud:
|If you are a male of our species, you recognize fun when you see it. Fun is often tied to disorder, here is an example:
|If you are a male of our species, you recognize fun when you see it, but not necessarily disorderin contrast to your wife. However, since we want to be precise, we won't rely on your wife. We must now find a way to measure disorder, not just talk about it in so many words.
|Measuring something always means to assign a number
to whatever you measure. If you have numbers you can do calculations. If you have natural laws (like the second law) in
the form of equations and
some numbers, you can do science. If you can do science you need not consult crystal spheres or (worse) consultants
if you want to find out what will happen.
Being able to assess disorder by numbers is quite useful in other contexts, too. For example in computer science, not to mention in everyday life ("Paris, your room today is 4,7 time more disorderly than yesterday, when it was at a 16,3 level. Clean up at least to a disorder level of 5! That means you must cast out two used lovers and you must put your used underwear in the hamper").
|Measuring and calculating disorder is actually rather easy, provided you like to wallow in mathematical things like logarithms, factorials, combinatorics and some calculus. Just look up the science module or ask your friendly physicist down the block to see how it is done.
|She will tell you to use one of the famous fundamental equations of statistical thermodynamics that goes back to one of the big if unknown heroes of physics: Ludwig Boltzmann (1844 - 1906). We will get back to him later again, but here is his grave stone for starters:
|You must admit that I kept my promise of "no equations" here. Boltzmann never promised anything like that.
|For the special kind of disorder that we find in crystals and that we can calculate and measure precisely, we will now use a different word, and that word is
|If that sounds Greek to you, that's because it is: "Tropae" means "metamorphism" or "transformation", and that is what entropy does: it forces things to change, sometimes rather suddenly.
|Entropy, for reasons even I don't know, is
abbreviated with the capital letter "S" in equations or otherwise, and I will use that abbreviation
every now and then in what comes up. Like right now, because we need to be a bit more precise about that compromise between
low energy and high disorder, the way you must balance the two for achieving nirvana.
Without using equations, here is what you do: multiply the number that tells you how disorderly things are (the entropy S) by the absolute temperature T as measured in degrees Kelvin (K).
What you get is the product TS, a number, and that's the quantity you balance against the energy (another number).
|Balancing is simple: You subtract the number TS from the number giving the energy. The resulting number is your comfort account (measured in terms of energy). In contrast to your investment account (measured in terms of in Dollars), you want your comfort account to be small. If it is as small as possible under the prevailing circumstances you have achieved nirvana. See it like your tax account. The smaller the better.
|By the way, it's easy to convert Centigrade to Kelvin: just add 273 to whatever oC temperature you have in order to obtain the absolute temperature. Room temperature is about 21 oC; on the absolute scale we thus have 21 + 273=294 Kelvin (K).
|Being magnanimous about details, we take 300 K to give room temperature.
|If you like Fahrenheit best, you figure out the conversion to Kelvin yourself. That's the proper punishment for weird tastes. This link may help.
|So once more: T times S is the number that you balance against whatever number describes the energy of your system.
|While that looks easy it is, in fact, a bit tricky. If the energy would be constant,
all you have to do is to create as much disorder as possible to achieve nirvana. However, generating disorder and thus a
large S may cost you in terms of energy.
Your problem thus is to figure out just how much investment in some additional energy will give you the best return in terms of TS. If you do it right (don't let investment bankers help you), you will achieve nirvana.
Let's look at a simple example. If your present state is described by having an energy of 12 and a TS of 4, your balance is 12 - 4=8. If an investment of 3 in terms of additional energy buys an additional TS of 5, your balance is now (12 + 3) - (4 + 5)=6. You are then better off to raise your energy because the return on that investment gets you closer to nirvana.
|For iron and steel crystals, the only systems we are interested in here, low energy means perfect order. Then you have the maximum energy gain by bonding to as many neighbors as possible. Energy gain means that the energy goes out of the system (think about the bonding of hydrogen and oxygen described before), and that's why the system energy goes down and becomes smaller.
|Perfect order means that the entropy S is
and therefore TS is also zero.
For an iron crystal or better, for any crystal, you simply can't have low energy and a lot of disorder at the same time. We need to compromise. Invest some additional energy and reap the benefits in a sizeable TS. If a certain investment in energy (say 3 units) buys a certain S (say 5 units), then the best return on investment obviously occurs at high temperature T .
|Congratulations! Now you suddenly understand why
things melt at high temperature. And you understand why the melting
point always goes down when you alloy a pure element with something else, as already claimed in chapter 2.3.1.
Or do you?
|Well, things melt because at the melting point it "pays" to invest heavily into entropy, to make things far
more disordered. Atoms milling around in a liquid are certainly far less orderly than being nicely kept at fixed crystal
It always takes a lot of energy (the melting energy or heat of melting) to turn a crystal into a liquid; it is a big investment. You must, after all, take all the atoms apart. At the melting point the product of temperature T and entropy S exactly balances the melting energy; for temperatures higher than the melting point it thus pays to be liquid. TS is then larger than the energy investment.
If you go the other way around, it works the other way around. Upon freezing or solidification, things get far more orderly and you loose out on the TS term. For that you gain energy, the heat of solidification.
|So when you melt something, you must
invest energy. That's everyday experience. You know
that because things don't melt all of a sudden. You have to keep heating (investing energy) your frozen dinner quite a while
before it is no longer solid.
Contrariwise, when you freeze something, you release energyexactly the same amount it took to liquefy it. That's why it takes a while to make ice cubes from water. The energy released when the first part freezes heats up the water again and you need to take that energy away. That's all your refrigerator / freezer does: sucking out the energy released when things cool down or freeze.
|Why does the melting point always come down if we alloy our material with something else? Put some salt into water and it is still liquid somewhat below 0 oC (32 oF).
|Easy. If the crystal is alloyed with something, it is automatically more disorderly than in its pure state (all these foreign atoms not fitting in properly, loitering around at random). S is always larger for a dirty crystal than for the pure state. So the product TS now balances the not much changed melting energy already at lower temperatures.
|That is important! Adding a little bit of something (like carbon to iron) makes the system always more disorderly and thus increases the entropy.
|Now we start to get somewhere. This is the precise moment where we can start to look seriously into the big "why " question:
© H. Föll (Iron, Steel and Swords script)