||So far we have looked at how light interacts with matter; eventually
disappearing by some kind of absorption. Here we look - very briefly - at the principles of generating light. |
| || ||If we were to look at all the electromagnetic radiation there is - from long wave radio to g rays - we would now have to start a long lecture course by itself. Even if we restrict
ourselves to visible light plus a bit of infrared and ultraviolet, we still have a
large task ahead of us. |
| || ||In the context of this lecture course we can do no more than to enumerate major light generating
principles together with a few key properties. |
light source will be characterized by the kind of light it produces. For that we look first at the properties of the light produced : |
| || || |
- Monochromatic or polychromatic. In the latter case we want
to know the spectrum. The link gives an example, it shows the spectrum of our most important light source.
- Spectral details. Even for monochromatic light of wavelength l we need to
know details like the spread ±Dl and the stability in time, i.e.
- Emission characteristic. Is the light
emitted in just one direction (as in a Laser beam), in all directions evenly, or with some angular characteristics?
- Polarization. Is the light polarized linearly, circular, elliptical or not
at all (meaning that all polarization directions occur with the same probability).
- Intensity or energy density. Possibly as a function of l,
emittance angle, polarization and so on.
technically minded we are just as interested in technical
- Power efficiency hlight, telling
us how many percent of the energy flowing into a light source comes out as energy of light we want.
- Luminous efficacy, telling us how the eye perceives
efficiency. In other words, if a green and violet light source have the same efficiency and produce the same number of
photons per second that are entering your eye, the green one will have a far higher efficacy, appearing brighter, because the eye is far more sensitive to green than to violet
- Device lifetime. After how many hours of operation do you
have to replace your light source by a new one?
- Maintenance. Is some regular service needed including, e.g., replacements of parts or
- Costs. How much do you have to pay for the device
up front? How large are the operating costs?
| || ||The technical properties are the more interesting
ones for everyday life. For very basic research it might be the other way around. |
| ||Roughly 20 % of the electrical energy produced on the
planet goes into light production. This is more electricity than all nuclear and water power plants produce.
| || ||The CO2 produced just
for illumination is about 70 % of that from cars and three times more than that from air traffic. The picture
gives an idea of what that implies. |
| || ||
|The planet at night showing artificial illumination. |
| ||Given the energy and
climate crisis, the need for new light sources with high efficiency / efficacy is obvious. |
| || ||Helping to save the planet in this way is one of the
major jobs for Material Scientists and Engineers. Right now, and for many years to come. |
| || ||
||Anything very hot emits light and if the "anything" is a
"black-body" we know the spectrum emitted as a function of temperature because this is is given Planck's famous equation |
| || ||
|En · dn |
| = |
| || |
| 8 · p ·
n3 · (hn)2 |
c3 · kT
| · d(hn)
| || |
|For an elegant derivation see this link || |
| || ||Light generated
by hot bodies we call "black body radiation" or incandescend light, resulting from incandescence |
| || ||The temperature of the sun surface is about 5800 K. Tungsten (W), the typical filament
material of a light bulb, melts at 3683 K. The temperature of the light emitting part of a light bulb is thus
around 3000 K. If you look at the spectrum above, one conclusion is inevitable: |
| || ||
|Black body radiation light sources will always have a lousy efficiency |
| || ||Most of the radiation emitted
is not in the frequency range of interest, and there is little you can do. Moreover, quite a bit of the energy input
is wasted by simply heating the device. Ideal black body radiators at 4000 K or 7000 K have efficiencies
around 7 % or 14 %, respectively. Our ubiquitous light bulb converts the electrical power
UI flowing through with an efficiency of about 5 % to light energy. |
| || ||Since a lot of the electrical energy produced goes
into light, and given the current and future energy crisis, this needs to be changed presto. There is thus no choice
but to employ another principle for producing light |
| || || |
| ||Hot bodies emit light because thermal
energy is sufficient to move electrons up to all kinds of high energy levels Ehigh from which
they transit to all kinds of lower lying levels Elow. Since all kinds of
Ehigh – Elow occur, the spectrum emitted covers a large
wavelength region. |
| || ||If we
want to make light more efficiently we have to make sure that DE = hn's available for electrons are in the visible range. Do we have examples for that?
| || ||Words like "Luminescence" or "Phosphorescence"
come to mind. Certain materials (called "phosphors" on
occasion) have convenient energy levels for visible light production and as soon as you feed them "somehow"
with energy so their electrons can populate the upper energy levels, they start to luminesce or phosphoresce. The difference between those
modes is simple: |
|Luminescence: || ||General name for "cold" light production |
| || || |
|Fluorescence: || ||Light production shortly after energy input
Short life time of excited level (< µs)
| || || |
|Phosphorescence: || ||Light production long after energy input |
life time of excited level (> ms)
| ||So what we want is fluorescence. The big question now is how we "excite" the luminescent material. In
other words, how do we supply the energy flow necessary for kicking those electrons up to the proper energy levels all
the time. Let's enumerate the major possibilities. A more complete list can be
found via the link |
| || || |
- Cathodoluminescence refers to the use of "cathode rays" or simple
electrons with sufficient energy. The light generated by good old TV tubes (before the advent of flat panel displays)
is generated by cathodoluminescence and so is the light from "fluorescent tubes".
- Electroluminescence refers to excitation by simply running a current through the
system that neither heats nor generates a plasma but moves carriers to the high energy level called conduction band in this case.
- Photoluminescence refers to excitation by light of a somewhat higher energy than
what we want to generate. Seems to defy the purpose but is nonetheless an important mechanism as we shall see.
| || ||This link lists about 10 more types of luminescence; some with quite
interesting properties. |
| ||Cathodoluminescence is the principle behind what we generally know as fluorescent lamp or fluorescent tube. We have
a gas-discharge lamp and the electrons in the plasma have enough energy to excite the mercury vapor in the plasma
produced. The excited mercury atoms then produce ultraviolet light that then causes a phosphor to fluoresce, producing
visible light. So we do have indirectly photoluminescence in there as well.
| || ||The major advantage is a good efficiency
around 20 %. A typical spectrum is shown below, the green bar marks the visible region. |
| || ||
| || ||The picture makes clear why
luminescence can have a high efficiency: A lot of the energy going in comes out as light with sharp frequencies in the
visible range. There is no need to always produce a lot of infrared and ultraviolet light in the process. |
| || ||The disadvantages are clear, too. Mercury (Hg)
is needed, causing environmental hazards, and the rare earths Terbium (Tb) and Europium (Eu) are called
"rare" for a reason. Right now (2011) China controls around 90 % of the rare earth market and
what that means is that prices are bound to go up in years to come. You also have to condier that teh ligh tmay appear
white because it haas trhe right moc of wavelnegth but that its spectrum is rather different form that of the sun or
any other black body radiator. |
| || ||Using direct photoluminescence as light source is of course (?)
ridiculous so we won't discuss it any more. |
| ||This leaves us
with electroluminescence or, to use another word for essentially the same
thing, radiant electron - hole recombination in semiconductors. In yet other words:
I'm now turning to LEDs as light sources. |
| || ||This can be done with very large efficiencies. We are talking the future of lighting here. |
| || ||How it's done we will see briefly in chapter 5.3. Otherwise use these links |
| || ||
© H. Föll (Advanced Materials B, part 1 - script)