 |
The dielectric constant er "somehow" describes the
interaction of dielectric (i.e. more or less insulating) materials and
electrical fields; e.g. via the equations Þ |
|
|
|
 |
D is the electrical
displacement or electrical flux density, sort of replacing E in the Maxwell equations whenever materials
are encountered. |
|
|
 |
C is the capacity of a parallel
plate capacitor (plate area A, distance d) that is
"filled" with a dielectric with er |
|
|
 |
n is the index of refraction; a
quantity that "somehow" describes how electromagnetic fields with
extremely high frequency interact with matter.
in this equaiton it is assumed that the material has no magnetic properties at
the frequency of light. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
Electrical fields inside dielectrics
polarize the material, meaning that the vector sum of electrical dipoles inside
the material is no longer zero. |
|
|
|
 |
The decisive quantities are the dipole moment
µ, a vector, and the Polarization P, a vector,
too. |
|
|
|
 |
Note: The dipole moment vector points from the
negative to the positive charge - contrary to the electrical field vector! |
|
|
 |
The dipoles to be polarized are either already
present in the material (e.g. in H2O or in ionic crystals) or
are induced by the electrical field (e.g. in single atoms or covalently bonded
crystals like Si) |
|
|
 |
The dimension of the polarization
P is [C/cm2] and is indeed identical to
the net charge found on unit area ion the surface of a polarized
dielectric. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
The equivalent of "Ohm's
law", linking current density to field strength in conductors is the
Polarization law: |
|
|
|
 |
The decisive material parameter is
c
("kee"), the dielectric
susceptibility |
|
|
 |
The "classical" flux density
D and the Polarization are linked as shown. In essence,
P only considers what happens in the material, while
D looks at the total effect: material plus the field that induces
the polarization. |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Polarization by necessity moves
masses (electrons and / or atoms) around, this will not happen arbitrarily
fast. |
|
|
|
 |
er
or c thus must be functions of the frequency
of the applied electrical field, and we want to consider the whole frequency
range from RF via HF to light and beyond. |
|
er(w) is called
the "dielectric function" of the material. |
 |
The tasks are:
- Identify and (quantitatively) describe the major mechanisms of
polarization.
- Justify the assumed linear relationship between P and
c.
- Derive the dielectric function for a given material.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
(Dielectric) polarization mechanisms
in dielectrics are all mechanisms that
- Induce dipoles at all (always with µ in field direction)
Þ Electronic polarization.
- Induce dipoles already present in the material to "point" to some
extent in field direction.
Þ Interface polarization.
Þ Ionic polarization.
Þ Orientation polarization.
|
|
Quantitative considerations of polarization mechanisms
yield
- Justification (and limits) to the P µ E "law"
- Values for c
- c = c(w)
- c = c(structure)
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Electronic polarization describes the
separation of the centers of "gravity" of the electron charges in
orbitals and the positive charge in the nucleus and the dipoles formed this
way. it is always present |
|
|
|
 |
It is a very weak effect in (more or less
isolated) atoms or ions with spherical symmetry (and easily calculated). |
|
|
 |
It can be a strong effect in e.g. covalently
bonded materials like Si (and not so easily calculated) or generally, in
solids. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ionic polarization describes the net
effect of changing the distance between neighboring ions in an ionic crystal
like NaCl (or in crystals with some ionic component like
SiO2) by the electric field |
|
|
|
 |
Polarization is linked to bonding strength, i.e.
Young's modulus Y. The effect is smaller for "stiff"
materials, i.e.
P µ 1/Y |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
Orientation polarization results from
minimizing the free enthalpy of an ensemble of (molecular) dipoles that can
move and rotate freely, i.e. polar liquids. |
|
 |
 |
| Without field |
With field |
|
|
 |
It is possible to calculate the effect, the
result invokes the Langevin function |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
In a good approximation the polarization is given
by Þ |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
The induced dipole moment
µ in all mechanisms is proportional to the field (for reasonable
field strengths) at the location of the atoms / molecules considered. |
|
|
|
 |
The proportionality constant is called
polarizability a; it is a microscopic
quantity describing what atoms or molecules "do" in a field. |
|
|
 |
The local field, however, is not identical to the
macroscopic or external field, but can be obtained from this by the Lorentz
approach |
|
 |
| Eloc = Eex +
Epol + EL +
Enear |
|
|
|
 |
For isotropic materials (e.g. cubic crystals) one
obtains |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Knowing the local field, it is now
possible to relate the microscopic quantity a
to the macroscopic quantity e or er via the Clausius - Mosotti equations
Þ |
|
N · a
3 e0 |
=
|
er
1
er + 2 |
| |
|
|
|
= |
c
c + 3 |
|
|
|
 |
While this is not overly important in the
engineering practice, it is a momentous achievement. With the Clausius -
Mosotti equations and what went into them, it was possible for the first time
to understand most electronic and optical properties of dielectrics in terms of
their constituents (= atoms) and their structure (bonding, crystal lattices
etc.) |
|
|
 |
Quite a bit of the formalism used can be carried
over to other systems with dipoles involved, in particular magnetism = behavior
of magnetic dipoles in magnetic fields. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
Alternating electrical fields induce
alternating forces for dielectric dipoles. Since in all polarization mechanisms
the dipole response to a field involves the movement of masses, inertia will
prevent arbitrarily fast movements. |
|
|
|
 |
Above certain limiting frequencies of the
electrical field, the polarization mechanisms will "die out", i.e.
not respond to the fields anymore. |
|
|
 |
This might happen at rather high (= optical)
frequencies, limiting the index of refraction n = (er)1/2 |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
The (only) two physical mechanisms
governing the movement of charged masses experiencing alternating fields are
relaxation and resonance. |
|
|
 |
Relaxation describes the decay of excited states to
the ground state; it describes, e.g., what happens for orientation polarization
after the field has been switched off. |
|
|
 |
From the "easy to conceive" time
behavior we deduce the frequency behavior by a Fourier transformation |
|
|
 |
The dielectric function describing relaxation has
a typical frequency dependence in its real and imaginary part Þ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Resonance describes anything that can
be modeled as a mass on a spring - i.e. electronic polarization and ionic
polarization. |
|
|
|
 |
The decisive quantity is the (undamped) resonance
frequency w 0 = (
kS/ m)½ and the
"friction" or damping constant kF |
|
|
 |
The "spring" constant is directly given
by the restoring forces between charges, i.e. Coulombs law, or (same thing) the
bonding. In the case of bonding (ionic polarization) the spring constant is
also easily expressed in terms of Young's modulus Y. The masses
are electron or atom masses for electronic or ionic polarization,
respectively. |
|
|
 |
The damping constant describes the time for
funneling off ("dispersing") the energy contained in one oscillating
mass to the whole crystal lattice. Since this will only take a few
oscillations, damping is generally large. |
|
|
 |
The dielectric function describing relaxation has
a typical frequency dependence in its real and imaginary part Þ
The green curve would be about right for crystals. |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
The complete frequency dependence of
the dielectric behavior of a material, i.e. its dielectric function, contains
all mechanisms "operating" in that material. |
|
|
|
 |
As a rule of thumb, the critical frequencies for
relaxation mechanisms are in theGHz region, electronic polarization
still "works" at optical (1015 Hz) frequencies (and
thus is mainly responsible for the index of refraction). |
|
|
 |
Ionic polarization has resonance frequencies in
between. |
|
|
 |
Interface polarization may "die out"
already a low frequencies. |
|
 |
A widely used diagram with all
mechanisms shows this, but keep in mind that there is no real material with all
4 major mechanisms strongly present!
Þ |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
A general mathematical theorem
asserts that the real and imaginary part of the dielectric function cannot be
completely independent |
|
| e'(w) = |
2 w
p |
|
¥
ó
õ
0 |
|
w*
· e''(w*)
w*2 w2 |
· dw* |
| e''(w) = |
2 w
p
|
|
¥
ó
õ
0 |
|
e'(w*)
w*2 w2 |
· dw* |
|
|
|
|
 |
If you know the complete frequency dependence of
either the real or the imaginary part, you can calculate the complete frequency
dependence of the other. |
|
|
 |
This is done via the Kramers-Kronig relations;
very useful and important equations in material practice.
Þ |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
The frequency dependent current
density j flowing through a dielectric is easily obtained.
Þ |
|
| j(w)
= |
dD
dt |
= e(w) · |
dE
dt
|
= w
· e'' · E(w) |
+ |
i · w ·
e' · E(w) |
| |
|
|
|
in phase |
|
out of phase |
|
|
|
 |
The in-phase part generates active power and thus
heats up the dielectric, the out-of-phase part just produces reactive
power |
|
|
 |
The power losses caused by a dielectric are thus
directly proportional to the imaginary component of the dielectric
function |
|
|
|
| LA |
=
|
power turned
into heat |
= w · |e''| · E2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
The relation between active and
reactive power is called "tangens Delta" (tg(d)); this is clear by looking at the usual pointer
diagram of the current |
|
|
|
|
LA
LR |
:= |
tg d |
= |
IA
IR |
= |
e''
e' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
The pointer diagram for an ideal dielectric s(w = 0) = 0can always be
obtained form an (ideal) resistor R(w)
in parallel to an (ideal) capacitor C(w). |
|
|
 |
R(w)
expresses the apparent conductivity sDK(w) of the
dielectric, it follows that |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
For a real dielectric with a non-vanishing conductivity at
zero (or small) frequencies, we now just add another resistor in parallel. This
allows to express all conductivity effects
of a real dielectric in the imaginary part of its (usually measured) dielectric
function via |
|
|
|
 |
We have no all materials covered with respect to their
dielectric behavior - in principle even metals, but then resorting to a
dielectric function would be overkill. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A good example for using the
dielectric function is "dirty" water with a not-too-small (ionic)
conductivity, commonly encountered in food. |
|
|
|
 |
The polarization mechanism is orientation
polarization, we expect large imaginary parts of the dielectric function in the
GHz region. |
|
|
 |
It follows that food can be heated by microwave
(ovens)! |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
The first law of materials science
obtains: At field strengths larger than some critical value, dielectrics will
experience (destructive) electrical breakdown |
|
|
|
 |
This might happen suddenly (then calls
break-down) , with a bang and smoke, or |
|
|
 |
it may take time - months or years - then called
failure. |
|
|
 |
Critical field strength may vary from < 100
kV/cm to > 10 MV / cm. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Highest field strengths in practical
applications do not necessarily occur at high voltages, but e.g. in integrated
circuits for very thin (a few nm) dielectric layers |
|
Example 1: TV set, 20 kV cable, thickness of insulation =
2 mm. Þ E = 100 kV/cm
Example 2: Gate dielectric in transistor, 3.3 nm thick, 3.3
V operating voltage. Þ E
= 10 MV/cm |
|
|
 |
Properties of thin films may be quite different
(better!) than bulk properties! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Electrical breakdown is a major
source for failure of electronic products (i.e. one of the reasons why things
go "kaputt" (= broke)), but there is no simple mechanism following
some straight-forward theory. We have: |
|
|
|
 |
Thermal
breakdown; due to small (field dependent) currents flowing through
"weak" parts of the dielectric. |
|
|
|
 |
Avalanche
breakdown due to occasional free electrons being accelerated in the
field; eventually gaining enough energy to ionize atoms, producing more free
electrons in a runaway avalanche. |
|
|
|
 |
Local
discharge producing micro-plasmas in small cavities, leading to slow
erosion of the material. |
|
|
|
 |
Electrolytic
breakdown due to some ionic micro conduction leading to structural
changes by, e.g., metal deposition. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
Polarization P
of a dielectric material can also be induced by mechanical deformation
e or by other means. |
|
|
|
 |
Piezo electric
materials are anisotropic crystals meeting certain symmetry
conditions like crystalline quartz (SiO2): the effect is
linear. |
|
|
 |
The effect also works in reverse: Electrical
fields induce mechanical deformation |
|
|
 |
Piezo electric materials have many uses, most
prominent are quartz oscillators and, recently, fuel injectors for Diesel
engines. |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Electrostriction also couples polarization and
mechanical deformation, but in a quadratic way and only in the direction
"electrical fields induce (very small) deformations". |
|
|
|
 |
The effect has little uses so far; it can be used
to control very small movements, e.g. for manipulations in the nm
region. Since it is coupled to electronic polarization, many materials show
this effect. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ferro
electric materials posses a permanent dipole moment in any
elementary cell that, moreover, are all aligned (below a critical
temperature). |
|
 |
| BaTiO3 unit cell |
|
|
 |
There are strong parallels to ferromagnetic
materials (hence the strange name). |
|
|
 |
Ferroelectric materials have large or even very
large (er > 1.000) dielectric
constants and thus are to be found inside capacitors with high capacities (but
not-so-good high frequency performance) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
Pyro
electricity couples polarization to temperature changes; electrets are materials with permanent polarization,
.... There are more "curiosities" along these lines, some of which
have been made useful recently, or might be made useful - as material science
and engineering progresses. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
The basic questions one would like to
answer with respect to the optical behaviour of materials and with respect to
the simple situation as illustrated are:
- How large is the fraction R that is reflected? 1
R then will be going in the material.
- How large is the angle b, i.e. how large
is the refraction of the material?
- How is the light in the material absorped, i.e. how large is the absorption
coefficient?
|
|
|
|
 |
Of course, we want to know that as a function of
the wave length l or the frequency n = c/l, the angle a, and the two basic directions of the polarization
( |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
All the information listed above is
contained in the complex index of refraction n* as given Þ |
|
|
|
Basic definition of
"normal" index of refraction n |
|
|
Terms used for complex index of refaction n*
n = real part
k = imaginary part |
| n*2 = (n + ik)2 = e'
+ i · e'' |
|
Straight forward definition of n* |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
Working out the details gives the
basic result that
- Knowing n = real part allows to answer question 1 and
2 from above via "Fresnel laws" (and "Snellius'
law", a much simpler special version).
- Knowing k = imaginary part allows to
answer question 3 Þ
|
|
| Ex = |
exp |
w · k · x
c |
· exp[ i · (kx
· x w · t)] |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Amplitude:
Exponential
decay with k |
"Running" part of
the wave |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Knowing the dielectric function of a
dielectric material (with the imaginary part expressed as conductivity sDK), we have (simple) optics completely
covered! |
|
| n2 |
= |
1
2 |
æ
ç
è |
e' |
+ |
æ
è |
e' 2 + |
sDK2
4e02w2 |
ö
ø |
½ |
ö
÷
ø |
| k2 |
= |
1
2 |
æ
ç
è |
e' |
+ |
æ
è |
e' 2 + |
sDK2
4e02w2 |
ö
ø |
½ |
ö
÷
ø |
|
|
|
 |
If we would look at the tensor properties of
e, we would also have crystal optics (=
anisotropic behaviour; things like birefringence) covered. |
|
|
 |
We must, however, dig deeper for e.g. non-linear
optics ("red in - green (double frequency) out"), or new disciplines
like quantum optics. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
© H. Föll