 |
(Dielectric) polarization mechanisms
in dielectrics are all mechanisms that
- Induce dipoles at all (always with µ in field direction)
Þ Electronic polarization.
- Induce dipoles already present in the material to "point" to some
extent in field direction.
Þ Interface polarization.
Þ Ionic polarization.
Þ Orientation polarization.
|
|
Quantitative considerations of polarization mechanisms
yield
- Justification (and limits) to the P µ E "law"
- Values for c
- c = c(w)
- c = c(structure)
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Electronic polarization describes the
separation of the centers of "gravity" of the electron charges in
orbitals and the positive charge in the nucleus and the dipoles formed this
way. it is always present |
|
|
|
 |
It is a very weak effect in (more or
less isolated) atoms or ions with spherical symmetry (and easily
calculated). |
|
|
 |
It can be a strong effect in e.g. covalently
bonded materials like Si (and not so easily calculated) or generally, in
solids. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ionic polarization describes the net
effect of changing the distance between neighboring ions in an ionic crystal
like NaCl (or in crystals with some ionic component like
SiO2) by the electric field |
|
|
|
 |
Polarization is linked to bonding strength, i.e.
Young's modulus Y. The effect is smaller for "stiff"
materials, i.e.
P µ 1/Y |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
Orientation polarization results from
minimizing the free enthalpy of an ensemble of (molecular) dipoles that can
move and rotate freely, i.e. polar liquids. |
|
 |
 |
| Without field |
With field |
|
|
 |
It is possible to calculate the effect, the
result invokes the Langevin function |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
In a good approximation the polarization is given
by Þ |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
The induced dipole moment
µ in all mechanisms is proportional to the field (for reasonable
field strengths) at the location of the atoms / molecules considered. |
|
|
|
 |
The proportionality constant is called
polarizability a; it is a microscopic
quantity describing what atoms or molecules "do" in a field. |
|
|
 |
The local field, however, is not identical to the
macroscopic or external field, but can be obtained from this by the Lorentz
approach |
|
|
| Eloc =
Eex + Epol +
EL + Enear |
|
|
|
 |
For isotropic materials (e.g. cubic crystals) one
obtains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
 |
Knowing the local field, it is now
possible to relate the microscopic quantity a
to the macroscopic quantity e or er via the Clausius - Mosotti equations
Þ |
|
N · a
3 e0 |
=
|
er
1
er + 2 |
| |
|
|
|
= |
c
c + 3 |
|
|
|
 |
While this is not overly important in the
engineering practice, it is a momentous achievement. With the Clausius -
Mosotti equations and what went into them, it was possible for the first time
to understand most electronic and optical properties of dielectrics in terms of
their constituents (= atoms) and their structure (bonding, crystal lattices
etc.) |
|
|
 |
Quite a bit of the formalism used can be carried
over to other systems with dipoles involved, in particular magnetism = behavior
of magnetic dipoles in magnetic fields. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
© H. Föll (Electronic Materials - Script)