 |
What happens if we apply an external
field to a ferromagnet with its equilibrium domain structure? |
|
 |
The domains oriented most closely in
the direction of the external field will gain in energy, the other ones loose;
always following the basic equation
for the energy of a dipole in a field. |
|
 |
Minimizing the total energy of the
system thus calls for increasing the size of favorably oriented domains and
decreasing the size of unfavorably oriented ones. Stray field considerations
still apply, but now we have an external field anyway and the stray field
energy looses in importance. |
|
 |
We must expect that the most
favorably oriented domain will win for large external fields and all other
domains will disappear. |
|
 |
If we increase the external field
beyond the point where we are left with only one domain, it may now even become
favorable, to orient the atomic dipoles off their "easy" crystal
direction and into the field. |
|
 |
After that has happened, all atomic
dipoles are in field direction - more we cannot do. The magnetization than
reaches a saturation value that cannot be increased anymore. |
 |
Schematically, this looks like as
shown below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Obviously, domain walls have to move
to allow the new domain structure in an external magnetic field. |
 |
What this looks like in reality is
shown below for a small single crystal of iron. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
As noted before, domain walls
interact with stress and
strain in the lattice, i.e. with defects of all kinds. They will become
"stuck" (the proper expression for things like that is "pinned") to defects, and it
needs some force to
pry them off and move them on.
This force comes from the external magnetic field. |
 |
The magnetization curve that goes
with this looks like this: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
For small external fields, the domain walls,
being pinned at some defects, just bulge out in the proper directions to
increase favorably oriented domains and decrease the others. The magnetization
(or the magnetic flux B) increases about linearly with
H |
 |
At larger external fields, the domain walls
overcome the pinning and move in the right direction where they will become
pinned by other defects. Turning the field of will not drive the walls back;
the movement is irreversible. |
 |
After just one domain is left over (or one big
one and some little ones), increasing the field even more will turn the atomic
dipoles in field direction. Since even under most unfavorable condition they
were at most 45o off the external direction, the increase in
magnetization is at most 1/cos(45o) = 1.41. |
 |
Finally, saturation is reached. All magnetic
dipoles are fully oriented in field direction, no further increase is
possible. |
|
|
|
 |
If we switch off the external field
anywhere in the irreversible region, the domain walls might relax back a
little, but for achieving a magnetization of zero again, we must use force to
move them back, i.e. an external magnetic field pointing in the opposite
direction. |
|
 |
In total we obtain
the well known hysteresis behavior as shown in
the hysteresis curve below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
The resulting hysteresis curve
has two particular prominent features:
- The remaining magnetization for zero external field, called the
remanence MR, and
- the magnitude of the external field needed to bring the magnetization down
to zero again. This is called coercivity or
coercive field strength HC.
|
 |
Remanence and
coercivity are two numbers that describe
the major properties of ferromagnets (and, of course, ferrimagnets, too).
Because the exact shape of the hysteresis curve does not vary too much. |
 |
Finally, we may also address the
saturation magnetization
MS as a third property that is to some extent independent of
the other two. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Technical optimization of
(ferro)magnetic materials first always focuses on these two numbers (plus, for
reasons to become clear very soon, the resistivity). |
|
 |
We now may also wonder about the
dynamic behaviour, i.e. what happens if we change the external field with ever
increasing frequency. |
|
|
|
 |
The properties of the domain walls,
especially their interaction with defects (but also other domain walls)
determine most of the magnetic properties of ferromagnets. |
|
 |
What is the structure of a domain wall? How can
the magnetization change from one direction to another one? |
|
 |
There are two obvious geometric ways of achieving
that goal - and that is also what really happens in practically all materials.
This is shown below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
What kind of wall will be found in
real magnetic materials? The answer, like always is: Whichever one has the
smallest (free) energy |
|
 |
In most bulk materials, we find the
Bloch wall: the magnetization vector turns bit
by bit like a screw out of the plane containing the magnetization to one side
of the Bloch wall. |
|
 |
In thin layers (oft the same material), however,
Neél walls will dominate. The reason is
that Bloch walls would produce stray fields, while Neél walls can
contain the magnetic flux in the material. |
 |
Both basic types of domain walls come
in many sub-types, e.g. if the magnetization changes by some defined angle
other than 180o. In thin layers of some magnetic material,
special domain structures may be observed, too. |
 |
The interaction of domain walls with
magnetic fields, defects in the crystal (or structural properties in amorphous
magnetic materials), or intentionally produced structures (like
"scratches", localized depositions of other materials, etc., can
become fantastically complicated. |
|
 |
Since it is the domain structure together with
the response of domain walls to these interactions that controls the hystereses
curve and therefore the basic magnetic properties of the material, things are
even more complicated as described
before. |
|
 |
But do keep in mind: The underlying basic
principles is the minimization of the free enthalpy, and there is nothing
complicated about this. The fact that we can no easily write down the relevant
equations, no to mention solving them, does not mean that we cannot understand
what is going on. And the material has no problem in solving equations, it just
assumes the proper structure, proving that there are solutions to the
problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© H. Föll (Advanced Materials B, part 1 - script)